As a third-grade teacher in Northshore, I’ve been down to Olympia to lobby on behalf of what I think is best for students. Specifically, I want to make sure that in the rush to close the achievement gap, we do not pass legislation that prompts districts and educators to focus a disproportionate amount of resources on a specific group. My mantra is some students need more time, but all students need some time.

I’ve lobbied in front of Rosemary McAuliffe on at least three occasions. I’ve found her to be respectful of opposing viewpoints and mindful of unintended consequences of well-intended legislation. I see her as intelligent, well-informed and willing to communicate.

I’m writing because my experience with Sen. McAuliffe differs greatly than the image projected in the Seattle Times endorsement article for the seat: (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2018563867_edit02legedist1.html) .

While she’s certainly open to hearing the viewpoints of educators, I did not get the impression that her priorities are “demonstrated loyalties to the education establishment,” but rather a dedication to do what is best for students.

I respect all the candidates in this race and need to learn as much as I can about all of them before I feel comfortable making a decision. That’s my responsibility as a democratic citizen.

From my personal experience, I will definitely weigh Sen. McAuliffe’s focus on students first, knowledge of education issues and pragmatism along with her track record when it comes time to pick up my black ink pen and fill in the bubble.

David Schneider